Editorial standards

We publish data-rich profiles and analysis for a general business audience. These standards keep our work accurate, transparent, and useful—especially where machine-assisted drafting is involved.

Selection & independence

Stories are chosen when they materially affect valuations, governance, strategy, or public understanding of a company or leader—not solely for traffic. Editors may decline or rewrite pieces that rely on unverifiable claims, anonymous single sourcing, or recycled press releases without added analysis. Commercial relationships do not dictate coverage; when a conflict exists, we disclose it in the editor's note on the article.

AI-assisted drafting

Some articles begin from structured prompts that expand headlines or filing snippets into drafts. Every AI-assisted piece is reviewed by a human editor for factual fit, tone, and missing context. On-page disclosure appears when drafting included machine assistance. AI is not used to fabricate quotes, numbers, or primary-source material.

Attribution & sourcing

We link to primary materials where possible (issuer filings, official announcements, reputable wire reporting). The “Sources & further reading” module on articles is the canonical place to start. When we synthesize multiple outlets, we add structure—timelines, stakeholder context, and implications—so the piece is not a thin rewrite.

Corrections & updates

Factual errors should be reported via our corrections workflow. Material fixes receive an on-page correction note with date. Minor clarifications may be updated inline with an updated timestamp. Net-worth and market metrics may change intraday without a formal correction when the underlying market inputs move.

Related: Methodology · Team & contact